Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 N.E.2d 430 - Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McGee v. County of Orange · Goldberg v. Ellett · Vig v. United States · Woods v. State · Tumulty v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Taylor has forfeited his claim of sentencing error by failing to present it upon direct appeal, when such could have been so presented.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[It is well settled that, as a general rule, issues that were or could have been raised upon direct appeal are not available in post-conviction proceedings, as post-conviction is not a 'super appeal'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Taylor challenges the post-conviction court's determination that his sentence was proper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.