Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 P.2d 1264 - Neilson v. Neilson

Neilson v. Neilson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2020

14 state decisions

8019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McHugh v. McHugh · 17 Cal. 3d 342 - In Re Marriage of Dawley · Gross v. Gross · Resource Management Co. v. Weston Ranch · Kimball v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The compensation of an attorney and counsel- or for his services is governed by agreement, express or implied, which is not restrained by law. From the commencement of an action, or the service of an answer containing a counterclaim, the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his client's cause of action or counterclaim, which attaches to a verdict, report, decision or judgment in his client’s favor and to the proceeds thereof in whosoever hands they may come, and cannot be affected by any settlement between the parties before or after judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause this is the result regardless of how long the marriage lasted, this term of the parties' agreement provides [wife] a $400,000 profit incentive ... to seek dissolution of the marriage at the earliest possible date”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “may not be foreclosed by way of the attorney's request for that relief in the original action; instead, counsel must bring a separate action against the client to determine the amount of the fee and foreclose the lien”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.