Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 P.2d 46 - People v. Atencio

People v. Atencio’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Andreas · People v. Bennett · People v. Gonzales · Balltrip v. People · People v. Santistevan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wle conclude that when the defendant delivered the unexposed film to a film processor with the request that a proof sheet of prints be prepared and returned to him, he forfeited any expectation of privacy in the film's contents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.