Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 P.2d 504 - People v. Johnson

People v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
5
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably People v. Smith (2005), People v. Scearce (2003)

34 state decisions

17019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he amount of restitution shall be fixed by the court at the time of sentencing and shall be endorsed upon the mittimus.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We read § 16-11-102(4) simply to require the sentencing court to fix the defendant’s criminal liability for restitution by considering the victim’s actual monetary losses- [It] does not require the sentencing court to determine a defendant’s criminal liability for restitution in accordance with the strict rules of damages applicable to a civil case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “As a condition of every sentence to probation, the court shall provide that the defendant make restitution to the victim of his conduct or to a member of the victim’s immediate family for the actual damages which were sustained. Such restitution shall be ordered by the court as a condition of probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.