Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 SO2D 151 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · 655 So. 2d 1123 - State v. Butler · 736 So. 2d 726 - Everette v. State · 766 So. 2d 1105 - Dozier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he C.I. . . . had never been used by the investigating officers before. He was arrested earlier on the day of these events and, after giving information concerning his drug supplier, was released. By arrangement with the officers, the C.I. used a pay phone to call a pager number that he said belonged to his supplier. The call was returned, and the C.I. stated to the officers that a man named Rolo would arrive at an agreed location to sell him drugs in about fifteen minutes.... The C.I. told the officers where Rolo lived, that he would be driving a maroon Buick with a tan top, and there would be drugs under the seat on the driver's side of the car.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The information given by the C.I. was not sufficiently reliable so as to provide the officers with the reasonable suspicion needed for a Terry stop nor the probable cause required to search Miller or his vehicle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.