Moyer v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 574 So. 2d 131 - Sims v. Brown · 436 So. 2d 1075 - Nance v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. · 256 So. 2d 50 - Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Byrd · 467 So. 2d 711 - Nesbitt v. COMMUNITY HEALTH, S. DADE · 477 So. 2d 1036 - Marks v. Mandel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact [that the proffered expert witness testimony] was corroborative of other testimony, or even cumulative to it, does not matter. A medical malpractice case is always necessarily a battle of expert witnesses. Within only very broad limits all qualified opinion testimony should be allowed; that is, not disallowed because it is cumulative to other evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woodson v. Go
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.