Szuch v. State

John SZUCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 2001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-03-14

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2006

5 state decisions

Relies on Connor v. State · Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *291 Kimberly S. Daise of Kimberly S. Daise, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The order denying appellant's post-conviction "Motion for Clarification of Applicability of 775.21" is hereby affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant to file a separate civil suit seeking injunctive or declaratory relief from his sexual predator designation and the inclusion of information about his 1993 offenses on the Florida Department of Law Enforcement website. See, Connor v. State,773 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement,762 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

¶5DELL, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.