780 So. 2d 693 - Ex Parte James’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 28 Ala. App. 291 - De Graffenried v. State · 536 So. 2d 142 - Heath v. State · 558 So. 2d 981 - Rothchild v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The “subject matter” in the criminal setting is the crime itself. Therefore, if the crime is committed in this State, our courts have subject matter jurisdiction. “ ‘If a crime is committed in this State, our courts also have jurisdiction over the person. Jurisdiction over property rarely arises in criminal matters, but a reasonable statement would be that, if property is illegally taken from this State or illegally brought into this State, our courts would have jurisdiction over this as well.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Houston v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.