780 So. 2d 920 - Sheriff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on King v. State · Ramirez v. State · 590 So. 2d 458 - Castillo v. State · 504 So. 2d 1353 - LaPolla v. State · 535 So. 2d 343 - Jimenez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A conspiracy is an express or implied agreement or understanding between two or more persons to commit a criminal offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To prove the crime of conspiracy, the state must prove an agreement and an intention to commit an offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gould v. State“It is well-settled that where one of two co-conspirators is a government agent there can be no conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.