Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 780 SW2D 659 - Vann v. Town Topic, Inc.

Vann v. Town Topic, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co. · Mitchell v. Archibald & Kendall, Inc. · Virginia D. v. Madesco Investment Corp. · Cox v. JC Penney Co., Inc. · Faheen Ex Rel. Hebron v. City Parking Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The sole and precipitating cause of the attack on appellant was his decision to intervene in the melee_ Even if it be assumed that respondent owed some duty to protect appellant as he left the restaurant, a failure to discharge that duty was not the proximate cause of appellant’s injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An intervening resulting cause is a new and independent force which so interrupts the chain of events initiated by defendant's alleged negligence as to become the responsible, direct, and proximate cause of the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Proximate cause is that cause which produces a particular injury without the intervention of an independent cause, in the absence of which the injuries would not have been inflicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.