Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 A2D 556 - Capano v. State

Capano v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. American Legacy Foundation (2006), Ortiz v. State (2005)

1 district · 67 state decisions

550200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Arizona v. Fulminante · Bourjaily v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “from the vantage point of the appellate court in reviewing the trial record, not whether it was apparent to the trial court in light of then-existing law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As a general rule, we must presume that 'the jurors followed the court’s instruction.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Q: And then February 27, 1998, after you are arrested, Debbie MacIntyre signs a cooperation agreement with the Government, right? A: Yes, she does. I didn’t hear the date you said. Q: February 27,1998? A: Yeah, I don’t know if that’s the date she signed. I know that’s the date she went in. For all I know she had signed it the day before. Q: You kept quiet at the bail hearing which preceded this, right? There was a bail hearing in February to decide whether you would stay in jail. You never said she did it, right? A: I never testified. Q: But you never said it through any means. You never told your attorneys, you never did anything? A: No, I was true to my word. I was protecting her. Q: You were protecting her. February 27th she signs a cooperation agreement with the State? A: Yes. Q: And you’re in jail? A: Yes. Q: You have-according to your testimony, it’s been horrible conditions that you’ve endured in jail, right? A: Very terrible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.