Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 F.2d 1421 - Cubanski v. Heckler

Cubanski v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

781 F.2d 1421 · 1986

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2011
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2011 · most notably United States v. Busher (1987), Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg (1991)

33 federal appellate · 4 district ·

4001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1316 (§ 1116 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396B (§ 1903 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 607 (§ 407 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Harris v. McRae · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · Schweiker v. Hansen · Batterton v. Francis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “effects a change in existing law or policy”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'adversely affect a member of the public.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “General notice of proposed rule making shall be published in the Federal Register, ... this subsection does not apply — (A) to interpretive rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.