Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 F.2d 494 - Miller Brewing Co. v. Fort Worth Distributing Co.

Miller Brewing Co. v. Fort Worth Distributing Co.’s Empirical Analysis

781 F.2d 494 · 1986

Citation profile

170
cited by 170 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 7 district · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 170 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Hoxworth, Chiron Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems Inc (2000)

43 federal appellate · 7 district · 37 state decisions

58019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 9

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Allen v. McCurry · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Inc v. Miller Brewing Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Waiver will be found when the party seeking arbitration substantially invokes the judicial process to the detriment or prejudice of the other party.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]aiver of arbitration is not a favored finding, and there is a presumption against it.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] party waives his right to arbitrate when he actively participates in a lawsuit or takes other action inconsistent with that right.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.