Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 F.2d 539 - United States v. Bourjaily

United States v. Bourjaily’s Empirical Analysis

781 F.2d 539 · 1986

Citation profile

124
cited by 124 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2021 · most notably Bourjaily v. United States (1987), United States v. Layne (1999)

70 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

64019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Douglas v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “agreed to participate in what he knew to be a joint venture to achieve a common goal.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “assume that participants understand that they are participating in a joint enterprise because success is dependent on the success of those from whom they buy and to whom they sell.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.