Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 F.2d 649 - Peeler v. Heckler

Peeler v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

781 F.2d 649 · 1986

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Burns v. State (1990), 722 F. Supp. 558 - Russell v. Eaves (1989)

13 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

2001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 404 (§ 204 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Flemming v. Nestor · Ex parte Garland · De Veau v. Braisted · Jensen v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] penal statute may also be an ex post facto enactment if it adds a new punishment to the one that was in effect when the crime was committed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a court of the imprisoning jurisdiction, presumably the court that imposed the sentence,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, no monthly benefits shall be paid under this section or under section 423 of this title to any individual for any month ending with or during or beginning with or during a period of more than 30 days throughout all of which such individual—is confined in a jail, prison, or other penal institution or correctional facility pursuant to his conviction of a criminal offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.