Caldwell v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
781 F.2d 714 · 1986
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2015
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Stone v. Powell · Wainwright v. Witt · Sumner v. Mata · Cody v. Solem · Mack v. Cupp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll Stone v. Powell requires is the initial opportunity for a fair hearing. ... Such an opportunity for a fair hearing forecloses this court's inquiry, upon habeas corpus petition, into the trial court's subsequent course of action....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reasoner v. Rode
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.