Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 F.2d 754 - Otto v. Heckler

Otto v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

781 F.2d 754 · 1986

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Schneider v. TRW, Inc. (1991), Hinton v. Pacific Enterprises (1993)

24 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

2101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Paul v. Davis · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Butz v. Economou

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The district court, of course, has the discretion to determine whether its investment of judicial energy justifies retention of jurisdiction, or if it should more properly dismiss the claims without prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[T]orts which constitute highly personal violations beyond the meaning of 'discrimination' are separately actionable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.