Donald G. Johnson v. Alan A. Stagner, Warden’s Empirical Analysis
781 F.2d 758 · 1986
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably United States v. Henson (1991), United States v. Johnson (1992)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Sumner v. Mata · United States v. Mauro · Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections · United States v. Ford · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“he shall be brought to trial within one hundred eighty (180) days after he shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court of the prosecuting officer’s jurisdiction written notice of the place of this imprisonment and his request for a final disposition to be made of the indictment, information or complaint; provided, that for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or his counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f a prisoner establishes that he validly invoked the IAD, and that a state court exceeded the IAD's 180-day time limit in bringing him to trial, he is entitled to habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'formal requirements must be met before the timely trial provisions of the IAD come into play'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.