Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 F.2d 769 - Jones v. Johnson

Jones v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

781 F.2d 769 · 1986

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
April 2022
most recently cited

83 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co. (1988), Sealock v. State (2000)

83 federal appellate · 9 district ·

63019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Bell v. Wolfish · City of Revere v. Massachusetts General Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough [McPhaul's] claim arises under the due process clause, the eighth amendment guarantees provide a minimum standard of care for determining [a prisoner's] rights as a pretrial detainee, including [the prisoner's] right to medical care.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “deliberately indifferent to [Ortiz's] serious medical needs.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.