Dube v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
17 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Nguyen v. Chater · Seavey v. Barnhart · 15101b Manso-Pizarro v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because the ALJ did not address contradictory aspects of the medical opinion offered”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mitchell v. SSA
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.