Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 P.2d 879 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2025

15 state decisions

12019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sery · United States v. Kerr · Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc. · State v. Holmes · United States v. Zukas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an officer may approach a citizen at anytime and pose questions so long as the citizen is not detained against his will; (2) an officer may seize a person if the officer has an “articulable suspicion” that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime; however, the detention must be temporary and last no longer than is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop; (3) an officer may arrest a suspect if the officer has probable cause to believe an offense has been committed or is being committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] fourth amendment analysis of police officer conduct is fact sensitivel,] . we review the facts in detail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.