781 So. 2d 109 - Meeks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. State · 521 So. 2d 914 - Reynolds v. State · 539 So. 2d 1375 - McClendon v. State · Smith v. State · 604 So. 2d 748 - Meeks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defendant is entitled to a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence where: (1) such evidence will probably change the outcome if a new trial is granted; (2) the evidence has been discovered since trial and could not have been discovered before trial by the exercise of due diligence; (3) the evidence is material to the issue; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative or impeaching.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A trial court has considerable discretion in determining whether to grant an evidentiary hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We will not set aside such finding unless it is clearly erroneous. Put otherwise, we will not vacate such a finding unless, although there is evidence to support it, we are on the entire evidence left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burns v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.