781 So. 2d 440 - Judd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Smith v. Illinois · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Steinhorst v. State · United States v. Palermo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[w]hen a party seeks to call a nonse-questered witness, a trial court must conduct an inquiry into whether the witness’ testimony was substantially affected by the previous testimony the witness heard and to what extent would the testimony be different had he or she not heard the other witnesses.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cokely v. State“`[t]he trial court's ruling required defense counsel to trust not test [the] Officer['s] testimony.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.