Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 781 S.W.2d 710 - Drapkin v. State

Drapkin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · California v. Trombetta · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · South Dakota v. Neville · McCambridge v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The contention that a defendant has a choice of method of alcohol level testing has been rejected in several eases. The courts have held that the method of testing for intoxication is within the discretion of the arresting officers [citations omitted]. Only after the driver has given the specimen designated by the police officer may he request an alternative test be given by a person of his choosing [citation omitted] (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.