Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 F.2d 1182 - Yates v. Jamison

Yates v. Jamison’s Empirical Analysis

782 F.2d 1182 · 1986

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2016

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

1301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Parratt v. Taylor · Paul v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the wrongful act is not sanctioned by any established procedure, and [where] state law provides a means for the plaintiff to be made whole for his loss occasioned by the wrongful act, there has been no denial of procedural due process because the state action is not necessarily complete until the termination of the state’s postdeprivation remedy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an adequate and meaningful postdeprivation remedy in the form of an action for inverse condemnation in state court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the `established state procedure' that destroys his entitlement without according him proper procedural safeguards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.