Capps v. Eggers’s Empirical Analysis
782 F.2d 1341 · 1986
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2017
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6682 · 26 U.S.C. § 7421
Relies on Lucas v. Earl · Johnson v. Righetti · Oklahoma v. Texas · United States v. Romero · Lonsdale v. Commissioner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the face of clear, unambiguous, dispositive holdings of this and other appellate courts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'based on some showing in the record as to the amount of such damages.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.