Bailey v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
782 F.2d 1366 · 1986
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen Corp. (1987), Charles v. Daley (1986)
55 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Allied Chemical Corporation v. Daiflon Inc · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · United States v. Locke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In addition, Trial Rule 6(B) states: Enlargement. When an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specific time by these rules, the court may at any time for cause shown: (1) order the period enlarged, with or without motion or notice, if request therefore is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or extended by a previous order; or (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specific period, permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but, the court may not extend the time for taking any action for judgment on the evidence under Rule 50(A), amendment of findings and judgment under Rule 52(B), to correct errors under Rule 59(C), statement in opposition to motion to correct error under Rule 59(E), or to obtain relief from final judgment under rule 60(B), except to the extent and under the conditions stated in those rules.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Eady holds that when a judge extends the time within which to file an application for a new trial, and counsel relies to his detriment on that extension, the 'unique circumstances' of this reliance allow the court to dispose of the motion before it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it [was] clear that it was not the judge's misstatement but counsel's misreading of the law that led to his failure to file on time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.