Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 F.2d 1484 - Howard v. Heckler

Howard v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

782 F.2d 1484 · 1986

Citation profile

128
cited by 128 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 21 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 128 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 15161b v. Dar a Smolen, Bunnell v. Sullivan (1991)

61 federal appellate · 21 district ·

5901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Richardson v. Perales · Beavers v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Murray v. Heckler · Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 128 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence, as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'Congress clearly meant that so long as the pain is associated with a clinically demonstrated impairment, credible pain testimony should contribute to a determination of disability'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “according to the pain threshold and stamina of the individual victim.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.