King v. Dole’s Empirical Analysis
782 F.2d 274 · 1986
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Mondy v. Secretary of the Army (1988), Montoya v. Chao (2002)
21 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver · Ratchford v. Gay Lib · International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc. · Bowsher v. SmithKline Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“notwithstanding any other provision of law”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the clear and emphatic language of the statutory provision”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brookens v. Acosta · Butler v. West“[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law ... cases ... must be filed within 30 days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hylton v. Dole D
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.