Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 F.2d 325 - United States v. Parrish

United States v. Parrish’s Empirical Analysis

782 F.2d 325 · 1986

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2025

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

6019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 28 U.S.C. § 1826

Relies on Simkin v. United States · Soobzokov v. CBS, Inc. · Sanchez v. United States · Dickinson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is far removed from traditional factfinding,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “based on all the circumstances pertinent to th[e] contemnor.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.