Union Carbide Corporation v. U.S. Cutting Service, Inc., in Re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of Union Carbide Corporation. Union Carbide Corporation v. The Honorable Susan Getzendanner’s Empirical Analysis
782 F.2d 710 · 1986
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. (1988), Draper v. Reynolds (2004)
43 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · United States v. Ryan · Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard · Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co. · United States v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Any justice, judge or magistrate of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances: (1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has a financial interest ... however small”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In matters of judicial ethics we are bound to give some weight to the view of the committee of judges that the Judicial Conference of the United States has established to advise federal judges on ethical questions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.