General Teamsters Local No International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
782 F.2d 839 · 1986
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably Aguayo National Labor Relations Board v. Tomco Carburetor Company (1988), General Industrial Employees Union, Local 42 v. National Labor Relations Board (1991)
19 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 8
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co. · Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp. · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he employer may defend the discharge on the ground that it had 'an honest belief that the employee disciplined was guilty of strike misconduct of a serious nature' and that the discharge decision was based on that misconduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a reviewing court's scope of review of the [NLRB's] remedial orders is narrow. The [NLRB's] choice of remedies will not be disturbed on review in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Striking employees who engage in serious picket line misconduct forfeit the protection of the Act and may be discharged for such conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.