McMonagle v. Meyer

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 2015.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2015-04-03

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2024

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-04-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Charles Marchand Bonneau, II, Esquire, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Brian G. Smiley, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

¶3ORDER

¶4THOMAS, Chief Judge:

¶5Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.