Front Range Equine Rescue v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis
782 F.3d 565 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 603
Relies on United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington. · Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation · Beattie v. United States · Cox v. Phelps Dodge Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This appeal involves environmental challenges to a federal agency’s decisions to grant inspection services for the slaughter and processing of horses and other equines at three slaughterhouses. In the proceedings below, the district court affirmed the agency’s grants of inspection.” 782 F.3d at 567 . We determined that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“vacatur of the district court's judgment is appropriate,” id., seemingly doing so with confidence that the appellants were not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.