Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 F.3d 576 - Doe v. Drummond Co.

Doe v. Drummond Co.’s Empirical Analysis

782 F.3d 576 · 2015

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (§ 303 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2340A · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1189 (§ 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Central Bank of Denver Na v. First Interstate Bank of Denver Na K · Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain · Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. · Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In weighing the pertinent facts, the site of the conduct alleged is relevant and carries significant weight.... When the claim is for secondary responsibility, we must also consider the location of any underlying conduct, such as where the actual injuries were inflicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[S]ince domestic law sets the standards for the TVPA, secondary or indirect theories of liability recognized by U.S. law are available for claims brought under the TVPA.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a comprehensive opinion on the subject” of aiding and abetting liability); Doe v. Drummond Co., 782 F.3d 576 , 608 n.44 (11th Cir. 2015) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.