Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hubbard v. Hubbard · Stolberg v. Stolberg · Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Noppert · Gregor v. State · 176 Ind. App. 406 - Unishops, Inc. v. May's Family Centers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the trial court's decision to grant or deny a motion to correct error for abuse of discretion. An abuse of discretion will be found when the trial court's action is against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before it and the inferences which may be drawn therefrom. An abuse of discretion also results from a trial court's decision that is without reason or is based upon impermissible reasons or considerations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.