People v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2019
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Youngblood · People v. Madson · People v. Greathouse · W.C.L. v. People · Crespin v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“neither immediacy nor spontaneity would be guaranteed by the federal rule, and because Colorado case law required a present sense impression to be instinctive and spontaneous in order to be admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“assertions about the declarant's state of mind are admissible to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Zubiate
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.