Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 P2D 285 - Lundgren v. Gaudiane

Lundgren v. Gaudiane’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2015

4 state decisions

201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bevins v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. · Urban Development Company v. Dekreon · Sheehan v. Estate of Gamberg · Groves v. Sentell · Gaudiane v. Lundgren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No execution may issue upon nor may any levy be made against any property of the estate under any judgment against a decedent or a personal representative, but this section shall not be construed to prevent the enforcement of mortgages, pledges, or liens upon real or personal property in an appropriate proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the judgment debtor dies after judgment, execution may be issued on the judgment in the manner and with the effect as if the debtor were still living, except as provided in AS 13.16.505.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the purpose of AS 18.16.505 is to freeze the status of all claims at the death of the debtor in order to provide for the orderly administration of the estate. 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.