State v. Albretsen’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · 54 Cal. 2d 621 - People v. Gould · State v. Madera · United States v. Watts · 15 Utah 2d 123 - State v. Owens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes,'wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ramos“in view of the fact that the State could not have reasonably anticipated the discrepancy between Davis’s handwritten statement and her later testimony at trial.” Albretsen, 782 P.2d at 518 (emphasis added). 4 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. Nelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.