782 So. 2d 1045 - State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime are principals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicated that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.