Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 SO2D 1155 - Shell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Shell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Bailey v. United States · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Nicholas v. United States · Mart v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Considering Ms. Shell's request for an increase of attorney fees for work done on appeal, we acknowledge that Ms. Shell successfully defended her right to compensation in the amount awarded by the trial judge. However, because she filed her own appeal on other issues, and was ultimately unsuccessful in that regard, Ms. Shell is not entitled to an increased award of attorney fees for work performed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.