Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 SO2D 188 - Ex Parte CTB, Inc.

Ex Parte CTB, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · 672 So. 2d 497 - Ex Parte Integon Corp. · 537 So. 2d 463 - Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc. · Hunt Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Supreme Oil Co. · John Boutari and Son Wines and Spirits Sa v. Attiki Importers and Distributors Incorporated

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Mandamus is a drastic and extraordinary writ, to be issued only where there is (1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; (2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4) properly invoked jurisdiction of the court.' Ex parte Integon Corp. , 672 So.2d 497 , 499 (Ala. 1995).”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “'(1) that enforcement of the forum selection clause[ ] would be unfair on the basis that the contract [ ] [was] affected by fraud, undue influence, or overweening bargaining power or (2) that enforcement would be unreasonable on the basis that the chosen ... forum would be seriously inconvenient for the trial of the action. '”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[T]his Court must affirm the judgment of the trial court if that judgment is supported by any valid legal ground, even if that ground was not argued before the trial court or this Court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.