Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

782 So. 2d 312

Elliott v. Elliott

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 29, 2000

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2000-09-29

Relies on Ex Parte Elliott

Decided 2000-09-29

¶1After Remand from the Supreme Court

MONROE, Judge.

¶2A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme *313Court of Alabama and the case has been remanded. In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, Ex parte Elliott, 782 So.2d 308 (Ala.2000), we affirm those portions of the trial court’s judgment relating to the issues of alimony and property division.

¶3We have previously affirmed the child-custody provisions of the trial court’s judgment, and we have previously reversed the child-support provisions and ordered a remand based on that reversal. Because we are now affirming the property-division provision and the alimony provision, we also affirm those portions of the judgment dividing the marital debts.

¶4AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur-.
/782/so2d/312 · .json · Public domain