Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 So. 2d 410 - Forget v. State

782 So. 2d 410 - Forget v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 507 So. 2d 1377 - Blanco v. Wainwright · 741 So. 2d 1125 - State v. Sullivan · 768 So. 2d 1179 - Harris v. State · 728 So. 2d 1189 - Lambert v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “holding that a defendant may raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal when `the ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record and it would be a waste of judicial resources to require the trial court to address the issue'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “effectively admitted both charges against him by admitting that Forget was guilty of possession of the pipe and failing to request a jury instruction regarding knowledge of the cocaine residue in the pipe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to request the jury instruction that would have required the State to establish Forget's knowledge of the presence of cocaine residue in the pipe”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.