Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 SO2D 946 - Childers v. State

Childers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State · 619 So. 2d 246 - Koon v. Dugger · Armstrong v. State · 642 So. 2d 67 - Williams v. State · 653 So. 2d 486 - Vazquez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 3.850 does not provide a second chance to raise allegedly reversible error that was argued in the original appeal by re-raising it under the guise of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The law is clear that where an issue could have been raised on direct appeal, it is not a proper subject for a rule 3.850 motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.