Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

782 So. 2d 969

Henriquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-04-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2001

1 state decisions

Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 375 So. 2d 840 - Downer v. State · 636 So. 2d 1342 - Baker v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-04-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Pursuant to a jury verdict, the appellant was convicted of armed burglary, two-counts of grand theft and criminal mischief as charged. This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and a motion to arrest judgment. Contrary to the appellant’s assertion, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient for the jury to conclude he had entered the subject residence without consent. See Baker v. State, 636 So.2d 1342 (Fla.1994); State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989); Downer v. State, 375 So.2d 840, 845 (Fla.1979).

¶2Affirmed.

/782/so2d/969 · .json · Public domain