Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 SW2D 618 - Fitch v. Burns

Fitch v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2018

14 state decisions

501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Stanley v. Illinois · Simpson v. Simpson · Wager v. Commonwealth · Davis v. Collinsworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires proof by clear and convincing evidence, the concept relates more than anything else to an attitude or approach to weighing the evidence, rather than to a legal formula that can be precisely defined in words. Like”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““McCormick [on Evidence, 2nd ed., p. 796, Sec. 340(b) (1972) ] states ... ‘no high degree of precision can be obtained by these groups of adjectives.’ ... the best formulation ... to express this concept is that the trier of fact ‘must be persuaded that the truth of the contention is ‘highly probable.’ ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.