Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 782 SW2D 709 - Berwald v. Ratliff

Berwald v. Ratliff’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America · McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. · Eugene Alper Construction Co. v. Joe Garavelli's of West Port, Inc. · Ted Saum & Company v. Swaffar · Consumers Oil Co. v. Spiking

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a judgment is in favor of the principal, the judgment is res judicata in an action against the agent, a derivative responsibility being present; ... Similarly, where suit is brought against an employer for the alleged wrong of an employee, it is held that a judgment on the merits for the employer bars an action against the employee, at least where it is conceded in the first action that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.