Westfall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1993
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · Alvarado v. State · Beggs v. State · Kelly v. State · Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person acts intentionally, or with intent, with respect to the nature of his conduct or to a result of his conduct when it is his conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result. A person acts knowingly, or with knowledge, with respect to the nature of his conduct or to circumstances surrounding his conduct when he is aware of the nature of his conduct or that the circumstances exist. A person acts knowingly, or with knowledge, with respect to the result of his conduct when he is aware that his conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Skidmore v. State“IV. A person is criminally responsible if the result would not have occurred but for his conduct. A person is nevertheless criminally responsible for causing a result if the only difference between what actually occurred and what he desired, contemplated or risked is that a different offense was committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morales v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.