Hunter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Minnesota v. Dickerson · Michigan v. Summers · United States v. Berryhill · Jones v. State · Downs v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the trial judge’s decision arguably relied primarily on the automatic companion rule, our conclusion in this case does not rest on that rule.”). 35 . Karnes, 62 F.3d at 496 ; supra note 16. 36 . United States v. Richardson, 949 F.2d 851, 858 (6th Cir.1991); see Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 507-08 , 103 S.Ct. 1319 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (plurality opinion) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.